I read more about this subject last week when one of the newspapers ran an article about the refurbishment of one of Erno Goldfinger's towers that were built as social housing.
the tenants were moved out to allow work to proceed and are now being told that they canot all move back in as some of their flats have been redined as affordable housing, for which they are ineligible.
It struck me then that it was quite odd that the very tenants from whom the tower blocks had been designed could no longer afford to be housed in a well-designed, iconic piece of C20th century architectire that had far reaching views and was only one flat wide, allowing dual aspect across the capital. You know, the sort of flats that the rich would apy a forune to live in.
That, and other snippets over the months have led me to believe that social cleanising is taking place on a large sacle with the 'prime' sites that are currently occupied by social tenants being requistioned for the more lucrative "affordable" tenancies.
It will of course all backfire when the number of people available to do the lower paid work drops below a critical level after theyve all been driven out of their social hosuing in one of the world's most expensice capitla citiies.
Quite disgusting