Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to think that 35 past 2 is not the new modern way of teaching the time?

43 replies

notnaice · 09/03/2015 13:17

I have heard this twice now. The first time I just put it down to bad teaching/understanding at school. The second, from a supposedly educated 20 year old, made me wonder if I'm the one out of touch with modern teacing of telling the time.

You can't say 35 past 2 instead of 25 to 3, can you?

OP posts:
MoominKoalaAndMiniMoom · 09/03/2015 13:19

I'm also a supposedly educated 20 year old, and always say "25 to", never "35 past".

You're not out of touch Grin

notnaice · 09/03/2015 13:21

I'm out of touch with modern spelling obviously. I can't spell teaching Grin

OP posts:
Fatstacks · 09/03/2015 13:21

My dyslexic adult ds does this.
It takes me ages to convert 38 past into twenty to Smile

Bue · 09/03/2015 13:21

I'd either say it's "2:35" or "25 to 3". 35 past 2 is a bit odd.

LegsOfSteel · 09/03/2015 13:30

Learning to tell the time is quite difficult for children.
35 past 2 is not incorrect and easier to understand. Surely teaching that first is better than jumping from 25 past 2 suddenly to 25 to 3.
I also think teaching quarter past, half past etc is confusing - they learn that first but don't actually understand fractions until a year or two later.

OTheHugeManatee · 09/03/2015 13:34

Sure, LegsOfSteel, but you'd think (assuming NT) they'd have learned fractions by the age of 20 Grin

Showy · 09/03/2015 13:36

Oddly, I find it almost acceptable if you say 35 minutes past 2. I prefer 2:35 or 25 to 3.

I lived in Sheffield for a while and they used to say while instead of until so if I worked a morning shift, I did 7 while 11. That used to confuse the heck out of me.

bensam · 09/03/2015 13:38

My MIL always says '5 and 20 past' and '5 and 20 to' which I find a bit odd. Have never come across anyone else who says it like that.

Xo90 · 09/03/2015 13:40

I've never heard anyone say that before. If it's 25 past the hour, my nan says 'its 5 and 20 past' I always find that strange.

Xo90 · 09/03/2015 13:40

X post bensam

Showy · 09/03/2015 13:45

I know loads and loads of people who say 5 and 20 past.

LegsOfSteel · 09/03/2015 13:49

Manatee yes, I'd hope they got it by the age of 20!Smile
I know some yr 4 and yr 5 children still struggling with fractions and time - You can see it's so frustrating for them.

sparkysparkysparky · 09/03/2015 13:54

We say "past " We say "to". Or use the digital 3:38. That's how tell the time. Unless you have a child development reason for doing it another way, that's what children should be taught.

loveareadingthanks · 09/03/2015 14:24

My mum does the 5 and 20 past/to as well. I think it's a generational thing - she's in her 80s and I've heard a few older people do it.

ScrambledSmegs · 09/03/2015 14:27

I love 5 and 20 past. So much more musical than saying 25 past. For some reason.

I used 'a sennight' in conversation the other day and no one knew what I was talking about. I'm mid 30's Blush.

Showy · 09/03/2015 14:34

I use sennight but only when talking to my good friend who also uses it. I also tell people I'm much obliged and wish them many happy returns of the day. DH is reluctant to be seen out with me.

EastMidsMummy · 09/03/2015 21:28

Where geographically soes sennight come from? (7 night i.e. a week??)

backwardpossom · 09/03/2015 21:30

Bensam The entire population of Germany? Grin

notnaice · 09/03/2015 21:59

What's sennight?

OP posts:
snowglobemouse · 09/03/2015 22:22

I have a scottish client who says 'the back of 6'/ 'the back of 11' / 'the back of whatever'. what does this mean?! Does it mean just after 6/11 or just before 6/11 or a lot past/before 6/11/whatever?

backwardpossom · 09/03/2015 22:26

I say the back of (I'm Scottish) and it can mean any time between quarter to the hour and quarter past, depending on what suits me. If I know I'm likely to be late, for example, I'll say the back of 11, say, and that gives me a bit of grace.

woowoo22 · 09/03/2015 22:32

It means some sort of random time before or after the hour Grin More likely after the hour but not always. Very useful phrase, I would plan for anything from 5.50 to 6.10 for the back of six.

StaircaseAtTheUniversity · 09/03/2015 22:38

Unlikely but is it an EAL thing with this adult, OP? I'm a teacher in a largely EAL school and the kids really struggle with all the quarters past/to and "twenty five to" thing. They all say the time as a digital readout ie "2.35". I assumed, when is ever thought about it, that all the "quarter past/twenty five to" thing was a peculiarity of the Enflush language. I'd welcome my theory being discredited by anyone who speaks a second language though Grin

StaircaseAtTheUniversity · 09/03/2015 22:39

God, several typos there. I promise I'm not EAL OP Wink

zipzap · 09/03/2015 22:42

Isn't sennight the old english for 7 nights that fell out of favour because we also had the word week to use - whereas for 14 nights we didn't have another word to use so continued to use fortnight?

I've also fallen foul of the american 'a quarter of' when meeting up with some - I turned up well in advance of a quarter past happy that I was nice and early - but they were furious that I was so late because to them it was a quarter to. It was so obvious to me that a quarter of was a quarter past whilst the other way round was so obvious to them that it never occurred to either of us to check that we were actually agreeing to meet at the same time.

I've subsequently polled friends as to what they think it means - and it's about 2/3 think the same as me, 1/3 think it's the american way - so still lots of chance for confusion!