So we have parking restrictions outside our house and so we purchased an annual visitors parking permit at the cost of over £100 a year to enable visitors etc to be able to park.
My childminder uses this permit twice a week on a Tues and Weds when she picks my children up from school. Several weeks ago she got a parking ticket. She parked the car up 5 doors down in nearest place, came into the house to get the permit, went back out to put it in the car and had a ticket. Car was observed at 14:48 and ticket issued at 14:50. We appealed on the grounds that she was going into the house to get the permit to display it. It has been rejected on the basis that you have to have the permit on display. I rang them and asked how is this fair she had 2 minutes to get into the house (my childminder is 70) and back and display the permit. Apparently 2 minutes is the statutory time limit it takes no account of types of road (e.g. where you might have to park further away) or age of individual and basically tough. She said it used to be longer but all London councils decided 2 minutes was long enough so it was reduced across the whole of London.
I asked them why would anyone buy a visitors permit then if you are always at risk when someone has to go in and get the permit (admittedly we were unlucky). Their solution - buy another visitors permit so your childminder can have one all the time. WTF???
AIBU to think this is really unfair and they are penalising people who have no intention of parking without a permit, and the only reason they reduced the length of time in my opinion is to generate more revenue from parking tickets.
Apparently the only option open to me now is not to pay the fine and wait for it to double and then appeal again at that point, but I wonder what the point is as I don't have a leg to stand on if we have breached the time limit set out in statute.