Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to be irrationally annoyed by bad maths

18 replies

Adventurous · 09/12/2014 13:46

So I have a piece of work I have to share with clients there are several rows of data with a cost % for each item. The total cost % is not the sum of the % over the number of rows that is just bad maths.

The cost % is the Total £ cost / Total £ revenue and breath.

OP posts:
Fudgeface123 · 09/12/2014 13:50

Well it would mean nothing to me, I'm number dyslexic Smile

MaidOfStars · 09/12/2014 13:52

So they think that if they pay 10% Item A and 20% Item B, the total percent cost to them for Item A + Item B is 30%??

Well done for only describing it as bad maths. Wink

Adventurous · 09/12/2014 13:55

No the worked it out at 15% cost even if you bought 1 @20% and 500 @10% Angry

OP posts:
Topseyt · 09/12/2014 14:00

Are you sure you aren't bamboozling them? It may be obvious to you what the spreadsheet or whatever it is means, but not to them perhaps.

Don't they just want to know the actual cost to them of the items? Or am I being dense, as I must admit I am not a mathematician.

Vitalstatistix · 09/12/2014 14:02

change the layout or add an extra column so that it is crystal clear to someone who is really poor at maths?

Topseyt · 09/12/2014 14:04

Is cost % a mark-up for profit margin, or VAT or something? Very hard to picture via an internet forum, though I would probably get it eventually if I could see it and have time to study it.

5Foot5 · 09/12/2014 14:04

Well I am not bad at maths (Got an A at A-level back in the day) but from your description I am struggling to understand what you are talking about. A worked example might help Grin

MTBMummy · 09/12/2014 14:05

I had one colleague who had to produce monthly graphs on call stats for an IT department (ie 50% broken hardware, 25% software upgrades, 15% password resets and 10% other)

She couldn't understand why the breakdown of call types always added up to 100% - one month she accused me of lying to her because it couldn't always be 100%!!!

Icimoi · 09/12/2014 14:14

I liked the manager who said they expected all departments to bring in above average figures.

CanadianJohn · 09/12/2014 14:15

I worked with a woman who didn't understand decimals at all. She thought that 0.25 was five times as much as 0.5

kim147 · 09/12/2014 14:17

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Adventurous · 09/12/2014 14:18

ok eg

A sales £100 cost £20 cost of sales 20%
B sales £1000 cost £800 cost of sales 80%

Total Sales £1100 cost £820 cost if sales (820/1100) x 100=74.5%

They had calculated (20%+80%)/2=50%

OP posts:
kim147 · 09/12/2014 14:18

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Adventurous · 09/12/2014 14:20

kim that is so true Grin

OP posts:
Adventurous · 09/12/2014 14:21

kim yes listened to it on podcast today Robert Mugabe OMG

OP posts:
Topseyt · 09/12/2014 14:31

Well, I can certainly see that simply adding the two percentages together would not make sense and would not have done that.

With the way you are wording things it is perhaps a little unclear. Do you mean that item A costs £100 but is being sold at an 80% discount for £20?

Similar for item B, only using different cost and applying a different percentage figure?

Am I barking up the wrong tree (wouldn't be the first time)??

Adventurous · 09/12/2014 15:15

I am saying they are different products and your total cost of production is completely dependent on the number of each products (with different costs) you sell and the proportion of each product sold will affect the total production cost

If I sell loads of Product A which I make a great margin on and a few of Product B which I hardly make any money on this is fine but if its the other way round it wouldn't be.

In the calculation I was presented with the number you sold of each product was irrelevant as it was the 2 % divided by 2 which is bad maths!!

OP posts:
Adventurous · 09/12/2014 15:16

Also Kim have you listened to Freakanomics a good podcast worth a listen for a geeky mathematician (which I am not sure I am!)

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page