Or rather how the English part of the Union will be post referendum.
Emotionally, I am very pleased it was a No and despite really trying to understand both sides of the argument I could never see a way an independent Scotland could thrive economically, but that's all done with now.
So, Scotland is to be given more devolved powers, at the same time as enjoying security of having the Union behind them. i.e. the Scottish Assembly can't fail economically, it will always be the Westminster government's fault.
In Westminster it (might be) English votes for English laws which is a great sound-bite and makes sense on an emotional level but what it achieves in practice is absolute rule for the Conservatives - at least until UKIP take over. Even if we have prima facie an alternative party in power, Conservatives would hold all the votes for "English" Laws. Whether you're a Conservative supporter or not, no-one can see that as a good thing for democracy, can they?
When does the campaign for boundary changes begin? How could that happen while the party for whom the changes would be detrimental are in power? And how will the governing party change without boundary changes?