The arson attack at Manchester Dogs' Home... absolutely heartbreaking and sickening. The fact that a young lad (15yo, I believe) was behind it is equally sickening.
However AIBU to have had a stern word with an old friend for sharing on facebook a photo purporting to be of the culprit, complete with his full name? The facebook page for the dogs' home have asked people NOT to share such images because it could prejudice a jury and ultimately jeopardise legal proceedings.
I get that people are upset by what happened. It was really awful. I also get that people often have little faith in the judicial system. But really, really am I that out of order for thinking it's nothing short of idiotic to post a photo that you don't KNOW is the actual culprit, when the very most that it could achieve is giving his legal defence reason to call a mistrial and end up with him walking away altogether?
I'm not BU, am I?