to think this couple should not be allowed to keep their baby?

[FuckOffWeasel]

How can there be any discussion?

www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/liverpool-woman-having-baby-convicted-7729662

Deadly you're simply wrong, sorry. I assure you that child sexual abusers are considered a risk to any child no matter what their preferences are. I prefer to take the evidence of my professional knowledge and experience over 'it's well documented in the press'.

Totally agree Ehric - nicely put!

Answering the question re my post on page 2.

The only thing that appeared to be changed regarding their home situation was that a childminder did the school run as he was not allowed on school property.

The children remained with their father in the family home whilst the mother continued to go out to work. He was convicted of possessing 1000's of images of young girls on his computer but as he had 2 boys it was deemed he was not a threat. Oh and maybe myself and other parents being cynical but the fact the mother earned a 6 figure salary and they lived in a 7 figure house might have had something to do with the fact the children stayed.

Category 4 and 5... Not safe.

It's one thing to have sexual attractions. It's quite another to have a proven history of believing you're entitled to sexual gratification relating to those attractions, to the point of abusing and raping others or facilitating abuse and rape. And that is what having a conviction of possession of category 4 and 5 photographs of children being abused means.

He wasn't convicted for having nasty thoughts he couldn't help. He was convicted for his actions. Category 4 and 5 images don't download themselves into your computer.

Holy crap mandy