Not really sure how it could have been handled better though.
We have an elderly neighbour who we've never really spoken to as she does not often come out of her house.
We speak to her daughter quite a lot. The daughter seems 40-50 ish and has learning difficulties and I'm guessing some health issues regarding her biliary system/ liver as is always jaundiced.
She struggles with social boundaries and will come round at special family events.
They recently acquired a little dog. A mongrel who has a habit of running off and causing havoc. It is not secured and rarely walked so this is not surprising.
Two days ago the daughter came round and was dropping lots of hints about the dog needing to go to the vets the next day. My Dad was due to be at home, but he is a builder and had all of the scaffolding up to do pointing on our barn therefore did not volunteer.
Yesterday the daughter turned up with the dog and a note from her mother saying the dog needed to be at the vet (an hour away) that afternoon and she'd be grateful if he'd take it and bring it back once neutered.
He was taken aback, but did take the daughter and the dog. When they got there firstly it was only a pre-op appointment and secondly they wouldn't do it as the mother needed to be there with proof she was on housing benefit.
They therefore want him to take them again.
I thought, although we are happy to help within reason, that this is really cheeky behaviour from the mother.
Today I have made some enquires for her and got her registered with The Dog's Trust and she can now have the dog neutered at our local vets.
AIBU to think the initial request was cheeky and my Dad should not have dropped his plans for the day to do a 2.5 hour round trip? Or am I a bad neighbour.
My Grandad will be taking the dog to his appointments at local vets now.