Our NDNs have a massive tree in their garden which overhung our garden very significantly to the point where tree "droppings"(!) were rotting our decking and branches were blocking out the sun for hours every day. Some branches were pushing up against our conservatory windows.
NDN and I are friendly and I recently asked him if he would mind DH and I paying to have some of the lower branches removed to give the tree a better shape and stop some of the problems we have been having. He said that they would be absolutely fine with that, and would have done it themselves but they can't afford it. We agreed which branches needed to go.
On Saturday a tree surgeon came and did the work. He was great and took a long time to do a tidy job and then cleared as much of the fallen branches as he could access. I am really pleased with the job - the tree looks fantastic.
Anyway, neighbour has just come home from a weekend away. He and his DW like the shape, but are concerned that some of the branches which fell in their garden were not cleared away. We are talking about a few (max 5) small branches which could easily be snapped in half and left out for the garden bin men. They want DH and I to go and clear them away. By contrast our entire garden was covered in branches, some of which damaged plants and all of which had to be dragged through our house.
NDNs are both able bodied and young, and our council are very good at collecting garden waste.
AIBU to think this is cheeky?
The tree is theirs and was causing damage to our property, as well as massively overhanging and blocking light. Yes, we wanted it cut back which is why we were happy to pay, but really isn't it neighbour's responsibility to keep under control?