2 things really made me think.
I very likely have ME, have had for years and regularly struggle with it. But I have never needed a diagnosis on the ground that apart from, learn to manage your energy, there isn't a lot a GP can do.
Dc2 has just had an assessment for AS and after two years of hoping for a diagnosis, he came out 'absolutely fine' even though he still has meltdowns etc etc.
in my case, I've never thought a diagnosis or label would help me in anyway. I'm self employed, my work is scheduled around my own abilities. DH knows I can't do as much as I would like.
In dc2 case, I would have loved a diagnosis as an acknowledgement that dc2 does indeed struggle even though it probably doesn't appear that way from the outside/at school. And the label would have been a way in to explain to him how his thinking is different.
Not having this long awaited diagnosis made think though. Does he really need a label? Do I? What are the benefits of having a diagnosis when you know you aren't going to get any help (which the case both for myself and for dc2)? What could be the benefits of NOT getting a diagnosis?
Just trying to get on head right there, wondering if it's worth fighting for another diagnosis, with all the issues/efforts it involves or if things would be better left alone.