I've had a slightly painful neck or upper back for a few weeks, no big deal. About two weeks ago I foolishly did some exercise I'm not used to doing, and it's now more painful.
I know if I see my GP he'll just say ice, painkillers etc, which I'm doing anyway, and come back in a few weeks if it's no better. Getting an appointment to be told this will involve ringing at a time I should be working (and I'm not allowed to use my mobile at work), then getting an appointment at a time I should be at work, and not getting paid for the time I miss.
In the meantime, I've seen an osteopath, who has poked and prodded, and treated me, and certainly after the treatment I did feel better for a day or two. I'm seeing him again later this week (at a time I can choose!) and hope to see some longer lasting improvement soon.
So, would I be unreasonable to skip the GP and just get some treatment, rather than see the GP who almost certainly won't offer any actual treatment at all? The money is not an issue, just in case anyone is concerned about that, but there's just a little bit of me that thinks it's 'safer' to see the doctor. What do you think?