I work five shifts in seven, 8.5 hour days. Sometimes my days off are together, sometimes they arent. An early is 7.30-4, a late is 2.30-11. Its the leisure trade and we are exempt from the Working Time Directive, and as such, at least once a week, if not twice, a Late will be followed by an Early. I and everyone who does the hates them but they are a necessary evil.
What I am questioning, is whether it is unreasonable to think it is unfair that I am in on an eight day stint? My next day off is a week tomorrow.
My bosses response is I have had four days off together ending Sunday gone. So? I should now forgo a day off for eight shifts? Especially as she knows I dont mind having split days off (one day off, back on shift then another day off later in the week).
I have a 2.5yo little girl, so every late shift is followed by an early start. I am also 16 weeks pregnant.
When I returned to work after having DD I made no requests for set hours,reduced hours, compressed hours etc, I simply returned as I was doing before I had her. Everyone else who has young children has made and been granted flexible working requests. I feel daft not having made a request when I could.
It is also making me seriously consider what to do when this LO arroves.
So....I digress....AIBU to think my eight shifts in a row, a mixture of lates and earlies, is totally unreasonable?