I am local... local newspaper has some very, erm, vitriolic responses amongst which I found this one
There are some who seem to try very hard to be offended, others for whom being offended is worn as badge of honour and many who are simply out to make political capital.
It struck a chord...
The land they are now developing for the 30,000 new homes is greenbelt, the land that separates Cheltenham and Gloucester, runs alongside the M5 and has been fought over for many years. It was, at one time, utterly unthinkable to develop it and make the two place on sprawling mess.
The threats are that we will lose hospitals, police, ambulance and fire because 'they' can say that ChelGlos is one place, ignoring the access problems and rurality that have made the 2 places separate in the first place. Lives will be put at risk.
The land she was specifically referring to was the other side of Cheltenham, 300 acres of entirely green belt, currently actively farmed and one rural community will lose access to the main road and will be effectively cut off. If ChelTewke happens there will be a similar loss of emergency services and greenbelt land, though that specific plot won't flood - but the surrounding rural and ancient communities will, for the first time.
Local roads are already at capacity, the motorway junctions will need rebuilding, meaning huge numbers of locals will lose access to Cheltenham during the rebuild and the new fire station will lose access to the motorway and the rural community it currently covers
The developers also own a large acreage of brown site a couple of miles away that they do not currently have plans to develop!
And on it goes. I live in the rural community on the other side of the proposed build and the fallout for us is quite shocking, we will be effectively cut off and re-routed (motorway and 2 rivers, only 1 bridge) for almost the entirety of the build - 15 - 20 years!
So the hyperbole was shocking, but does describe the severity of the changes currently mooted.