OP: AIBU
MN: Yes
OP: No, I'm not.
I'm not being harsh or judgmental. I was asking questions so we had the bigger picture.
I'll be harsh now though:
Not expecting them to break the law, like i said, the thought didn't even cross my mind when i walked in, i accepted it and left straight away, although was quietly confused and a little annoyed.
Quietly confused? Because you were asked to leave because of the law which they are accountable for?
given that a baby isn't aware what is going on. Perhaps discretion from the staff/manager when it comes to very young babies/children.
Again, from several posters - at what age do you think that law should start to apply then? When will that end?
Just because it wasn't a vital errand matter
So you could have done this at another time - without the baby?
My dad isnt computer literate, and anyway he only makes the occasional small bet for certain football matches. I didn't realise nipping in for him while i was passing would be an issue!
Fair enough, most people like a flutter - nothing wrong with that. You wanted to place the bet for him, again, lovely of you to do adn most of us would do the same. The issue is, you started a thread asking why the betting shop was being unreasonable - they are not, they are upholding the law of No under 18's. Next time, just don't take the baby.
Some people on here are so harsh and judgemental! Whatever happened to friendly debate!
Yes some are, but there isn't on this thread, yet. A friendly dabate happens when there is a debate to be had. There isn't in this case.