Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Parking issue

79 replies

Juno77 · 30/01/2014 09:18

I work in a private club.

There is a big car park out to the front of the building, and a smaller one round the side, next to the door. The staff use the smaller one.

Often, when the staff arrive, this area has been filled by lazy members who want to park closer to the door.

The operating hours only cover daytime (so members don't arrive or leave at night), but the staff are here early when it is still dark, and late into the night. It is in a very secluded area, and the staff don't feel safe walking across the carpark to their cars - so we asked if we could have the side part for staff only.

Note - the side one has lighting and is only 10 steps from the door. The big one has no outdoor lighting (can be pitch black - we have to use torches sometimes) and obviously depending on space, you can be parked quite far away. You can't always see your car from the door.

The request went to the board. The board denied it.

AIBU to be pissed off? This is peoples safety. Angry

OP posts:
Spatsky · 30/01/2014 13:17

I can't see that you need three spaces, just o e for the person locking up and think the club is being unreasonable in not allocating one space.

Point to note though, bet ya that if they did allocate a staff place at the side members would constantly park there anyway out of habit and selfishness so suspectit wouldn't be a solution in practice anyway.

Juno77 · 30/01/2014 13:20

Maybe three isn't necessary then. We just thought it wouldn't be a big deal, as there are 3 staff and over 200 spaces.

These spaces are behind the bins. They aren't even a nice place to park!

And yes, the members who park their now might continue to do so, but at least we would be able to ask them to move.

OP posts:
Pooka · 30/01/2014 13:23

I can see that it might be expensive to light the main car park. Which s why it makes sense to reserve the parking nearest to the building for staff leaving after dark.

Who makes up 'the board'? Is it made up of elected members? Are there any staff members on the board (like you get on a school governing body)?

I can sadly imagine the uphill struggle to achieve change if it's a golf club you're talking about. Would it be possible for you to take the issue back to the next board meeting, to raise again all the points in favour of changing situation?

In the meantime, I have a friend with incredibly poor night vision. He swears by head torches.

Juno77 · 30/01/2014 13:25

No, no we aren't involved with the board at all. It is, as you said, made up of elected members (all male). We can't go to the meetings.

Trying to get them to change anything is a huge nightmare. But this is something I really thought we could get them to understand that regardless of anyones perception of safety, the staff are not comfortable coming out alone at night.

OP posts:
45redballoons · 30/01/2014 13:26

I am going to stop asking questions about 'can't the staff do X because you said Y' because I feel everytime you answer something I have another question! (like if the club shuts at 4 why would there be any need for the chef to tell the people at the bar at 4 to wait while the other person comes back, also why is a chef incapable of working the bar for a few minutes - seriously don't answer this!)

However, none of that matters as you've handed me a new bone. If the specialists, I assume instructors, massage people etc. all have spaces then it seems silly there cannot be one space reserved.

I do think there are things that can be done if staff feel uncomfortable, from what I have read I do think they could help themselves a little, but, I also don't think reserving one space is all that difficult and would just sort out the problem.

Juno77 · 30/01/2014 13:31

45 I am going to as I hate unanswered questions Wink

The club shuts at 4, but because we are licensed until 1am, there is no requirement for the members to leave at 4pm. Basically they can sit as long as they like finishing their drinks - they just can't buy any more.

The chef can't work on the bar for a few minutes as he doesn't have a licence to serve alcohol - so it would be illegal.

The staff do try their best to get these spaces, and more often than not, they do. They do go and move, if possible, when they haven't got into a space in the morning (main problem is that you have to leave the building to see if the space is free.. so it can turn into multiple trips just to see if there is even a space available) but more often, they do get parked in these spaces.

We are just trying to make sure the space is guaranteed so there aren't times when they don't. It's just basic safety, I don't know why they've said no.

OP posts:
bigbluebus · 30/01/2014 14:18

Is it possible the board said no because the people parking around the side are actually the board members?
It does beggar belief that someone won't walk a few extra yards but can manage 18 holes of golf and the walk that it entails. But then as a gym member, I have seen people who park in the disabled space next to the door and then go in an do an hours workout. In fact come to think of it, one of the gym instructors parks in the disabled space too.
Can you find some cones somewhere and just put them in the spaces one night before you leave, so they are there first thing in the morning Grin

Juno77 · 30/01/2014 14:19

Ooh, sneaky bigbluebus - I like it Grin

That is a very good point though, I wonder if they are...

OP posts:
nennypops · 30/01/2014 14:27

Can you find out who their insurers are, or at the very least ask if they have told their insurers about it? If someone did get attacked or have an accident in the main car park late at night, I don't think the insurers would be too amused having to fork out because the board has specifically been alerted to the issue and has refused to take perfectly reasonable steps to remedy it. Apart from anything else, they would certainly want to put the premiums up.

45redballoons · 30/01/2014 14:44

Surely so long as the bar worker doesn't leave the car park then the chef doesn't need a lisence? also if they aren't allowed to buy any after 4 then they wouldn't have to serve anyway?

AAAAAAAAAAARGH, I don't know why I keep doing this! I am on your side afterall I do think they should put in a friggin reserved sign!

45redballoons · 30/01/2014 14:45

bigbluebus this really gets me too, people will drive half a mile to the gym to walk on the treadmill!

oscarwilde · 30/01/2014 14:53

Ironically if members cars were vandalised in the main car park there would be motion detected security lighting and CCTV in no time at all

wobblyweebles · 30/01/2014 14:56

Ahh just read your reply to me - in that case I think I'd go with cones or something similar. Would that work?

Featherbag · 30/01/2014 15:00

YANBU, I totally get what you're saying. I don't understand what some other posters are finding so unreasonable. Did you put your request in writing? With the specific risks you want to address by having the spaces reserved ?

ProfPlumSpeaking · 30/01/2014 15:13

So if the staff arrive first (in the dark) then who is it that is already in the spaces? Confused

If it is members, then I expect they appreciate the light (in the dark of morning) as much as staff. I agree that there should be more lighting though if anyone (staff or members) feels intimidated and scared.

Frusso · 30/01/2014 15:18

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Juno77 · 30/01/2014 15:19

The club opens before the clubhouse. So, some days members are already parked there when the staff arrive.

They probably do appreciate being closer, as much as the staff would. But it isn't as dark in the morning as it is late at night, and they are quite happy to walk round for the next 4 hours outside so don't think their argument holds much weight.

OP posts:
DameDeepRedBetty · 30/01/2014 15:20

Do any of you know the wives of these antediluvian board members well enough to get them nagging on your behalf? Or their daughters? They'd help quickly enough if it were their own precious womenfolk at risk wouldn't they?

DameDeepRedBetty · 30/01/2014 15:22

Frusso they asked. The board said no. Because they're a bunch of unreconstructed male chauvinist pigs.

Juno77 · 30/01/2014 15:24

dame no, I don't know any of their wives or daughters.

They are very old fashioned. It's not a very nice environment. Not all of them, obviously, but the majority. Really.

OP posts:
Felyne · 30/01/2014 15:40

I'd look at info from the Health and Safety executive. If an accident happened in your car park because it was dark and you couldn't see properly I'd think they would get done for it. It is the employer's responsibility to manage risks, not the employees'.

SelectAUserName · 30/01/2014 16:41

Interesting point, Felyne. Although they may display the standard car park disclaimer, they might still be liable for damage if the damage was caused by an action which could be reasonably foreseen or prevented (e.g. by providing lighting in the main car park?) and of course they have a general duty of care to their employees.

HoratiaDrelincourt · 30/01/2014 17:04

Agreed, Felyne, particularly since in this case the risk has been identified and a reasonable mitigation identified but rejected. That will be minuted in black and white somewhere.

GreenShadow · 30/01/2014 17:35

I work in a not-dissimilar environment where we have to work into the evenings and sometimes leave the building alone in the dark, so have every sympathy.

Do you have a 'Lone Workers' policy? If not, I would suggest that your employers create one. Templates should be easy to find on-line - perhaps you could point them in the right direction of one highlighting leaving the place of employment at night

ProfPlumSpeaking · 30/01/2014 17:51

ok, so it's not the mornings that are a problem - just the evenings, right?

Swipe left for the next trending thread