Based on a discussion at work this one, whereby a few of us have various ailments that came on at different parts of our lives. But this discussion is hypothetical:
2 people born with severe disability, wheelchair users, their whole life they've been used to their needs which don't fluctuate. Receive DLA without need for assessment, neither persons condition requires hospital check ups or medical treatment outside the norm of what any other non wheelchair user would expect to need. Neither person takes sick leave outside the norm of any other healthy person.
2 people with fluctuating conditions (think rheumatoid arthritis or fibromyalgia type conditions), came on anywhere from teens to later in life, required to fight for DLA and frequent assessments to keep it if they are even indeed eligible for it. Frequent hospital and medical appointments, frequent periods of sickness from work.
We couldn't resolve it other than everyone needs help and the system should be based on need.
But. I'm confused as to why one thing automatically opens a door but another (possibly more serious or more debilitating thing) doesn't.
Also does the disabling effects of a condition depend on when it life it affected you? So the earlier it hits the more used to it you are so the less disabling it is? Or regardless of when you, say, lose a leg, or go deaf, it disables you the the same degree as the next person in the same position?