My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

to think it's wrong to leave a baby/toddler sleeping alone in a hotel room?

765 replies

strawberry34 · 07/07/2013 14:03

When you have a monitor and are still in the premises?my friend says she does it when on holiday, she goes to the bar/restaurant and responds to the monitor if her 2yo dd wakes, I was shocked and said I wouldn't ever want to, I stay in the room and read a book/have a bath. Aibu to think what she's doing is wrong? I don't want to refer to famous cases but to me there's too much risk.

OP posts:
Report
catgirl1976 · 07/07/2013 15:01

The difference is the amount of unknown people in the hotel.

Report
ComposHat · 07/07/2013 15:06

I would be worried they'd drink the mini-bar dry and spend the evening watching the one handed channels.

Report
TidyDancer · 07/07/2013 15:07

No, I would never do this. I'd also be really unhappy if DP did it (he never would) or anyone taking care of our DCs.

There are too many reasons not to, and the only reasons to do it are selfish.

Report
ParadiseChick · 07/07/2013 15:09

Nope, never have, never will.

Report
AuntieStella · 07/07/2013 15:11

It depends entirely on the layout of the hotel. One where you have a ground floor room which you can reach in seconds and from which the monitor indubitably works is a whole different consideration from being several floors away.

Report
Nadalsballs · 07/07/2013 15:11

We went to a family hotel recently and everyone did this. The hotel even provided the baby monitors and everyone had them on their tables at dinner.

I think it does depend on the size of the hotel. This was a small hotel and the DCs were as close to us as they would have been at home. We tested the monitor and it was very sensitive. You could hear the DCs breathing and the monitor lit up if there was any additional noise - eg when DS rolled over.

We went to different family hotel and our room was further away so we hired a babysitter who was recommended by the hotel (most people used the monitors here too). In some ways that made me less comfortable as I didn't know them from Adam (although they were from an agency and had been CRB checked etc).

Report
curlew · 07/07/2013 15:12

Oh, it's an every stranger's a paedophile thread.

Report
TidyDancer · 07/07/2013 15:13

Is it curlew? I would disagree.

Report
Celador · 07/07/2013 15:13

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

AuntieStella · 07/07/2013 15:13

And I'm not sure the McCann case is terribly relevant here, as OP wasn't describing leaving the premises totally, nor lack of continuous monitoring via alarm.

Report
ParadiseChick · 07/07/2013 15:15

I don't think that's the case at all curlew.

There are many reasons that prevent me from leaving my child alone. A random paedophile just happening to be in the vicinity is way down the list.

To imply not wanting to leave your babies alone in hotel rooms makes you think enough to assume every stranger is a danger is quite insulting.

Report
TidyDancer · 07/07/2013 15:22

I agree Stella. The McCann case involved the parents leaving the building unlocked (and open?) and going to another place. There were long periods of time where the children were unmonitored and a parent could not have known there was a problem.

I still would not leave a child unattended in a hotel even with a baby monitor, but what the OP proposes is not what the McCann group did.

Report
AuntieStella · 07/07/2013 15:22

The likeliest risk is that the child leaves the bed and encounters a hazard. This can be mitigated by continuous monitoring with a good quality alarm. But you won't know if the signal path from the room is good enough until you test it out. So unless you always go back to the same hotel, you can't know until arrival, so is hard to rely on.

A ground floor room which you can reach in seconds means you can attend to your (monitored) DC as quickly as you would do at home. Ditto for scenario of hotel fire alarm (or home smoke alarm) going off. Being on a different floor loses time, and you may not be permitted up the stairs.

Report
ParadiseChick · 07/07/2013 15:25

How much fun can a meal be either you are constantly watching and listening to a box on the table?

Report
Drhamsterstortoise · 07/07/2013 15:28

You don't know who has access to the room.Its completely different to being in your own home.

Report
SueDoku · 07/07/2013 15:36

Anyone remember the Butlins/Pontins child watch scheme from the 60s/70s/80s when you registered your room number and a member of staff listened outside your chalet for babies crying (every 20 mins I think it was)? If they heard anything your room number would be flashed up on a sreens round the camp so you could return to see to your child/children? It seemed 'normal' then and most parents did it - but nowadays...? Has the world changed so much? Sad to say, but it has.

Can't believe that we used to do this quite happily when DS was a baby Shock. A real case of 'If I knew then what I know now'.....!

Report
2old2beamum · 07/07/2013 15:41

WE have 3 adults with SN and 2 DC's with SN there is no way we would leave them on their own. Sod our sex life Grin we sleep in rooms separately me girls him boys.
Regarding meals we all go or eat in room

Report
SmiteYouWithThunderbolts · 07/07/2013 15:47

I'm surprised that the consensus is overwhelmingly against. I thought it would be more of an even split.

Tbh, we've done it. Only in tiny hotels where the restaurant is about a minute's walk away and taking it in turns to nip back and check every 10 minutes, but it was that or sit in the room with them in the dark without making a sound! They were a bit older than toddler age then though. I wouldn't do it in a big hotel or with a child under the age of 3.

Report
megsmouse · 07/07/2013 15:49

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

janey68 · 07/07/2013 15:50

Curlew - pointing out that a hotel has public access and you don't know who may be working or staying there is not tantamount to suggesting every stranger is a paedophile.

You made the point that it's no different to being downstairs in a large 3 storey house, and people were simply correcting you, that there may not be a difference in distance, but a hotel is totally different to a private house where you know who is in it

Report
curlew · 07/07/2013 15:52

And these people are going to get into your locked hotel room exactly how?

Report
Willdoitinaminute · 07/07/2013 15:53

My DC recently had seizure in his sleep while we were staying in a hotel. He was in our room and we woke with a start when he fell out of bed. So glad that we have never been tempted to leave him to sleep on his own in hotels. Very scary experience. It was his first and hopefully only seizure.
If we hadn't been there the outcome could have been very different.
I doubt that a monitor would be very effective in a noisy bar!

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Forgetfulmog · 07/07/2013 15:53

Umm with a hotel key curlew, it's not exactly rocket science. Could be knicked from the parent or anything.

It's not worth the risk IMO, but each to their own.

Report
antimatter · 07/07/2013 15:54

so parents who are not agains this do it with a full knowledge that someone else has access to that hotel room?
i.e. spare/emergency keys for hotel staff?

Report
LookingForwardToMarch · 07/07/2013 15:55

Haha have you never been broken into?

Unless.it's an alarmed lock I am sure it wouldn't pose too much of a problem.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.