So DS is 8, in Y3, and has been learning clarinet since last September. He's getting ready to take his Grade 1 exam. Sometimes he'll practise happily; other times he makes a big fuss and it's all a bit stressful. DP is sick of trying to make him practise so I have said I'll do it exclusively. DS is no musical genius but he isn't hopeless either; he can now make simple tunes sound quite nice. We've had the form through from school to commit to lessons next year. DP has just (unbeknownst to me) had a chat with DS and said "OK B, you've got 3 choices. 1. Carry on with clarinet, 2. Stop clarinet lessons or 3. Stop clarinet lessons but try another instrument."
AIBU in thinking Option 3 is total madness? It would be the same hard work and gnashing of teeth all over again to master a new instrument (which he would probably also want to drop by this time next year). And I think it's wrong to raise a child to think that when the going gets tough with something you can just jack it in and dabble in something new. DP thinks I am being like a dictator and DS should be able to choose; but although I would be disappointed if DS stopped the clarinet I would accept it. I wouldn't force him to play it if he really disliked it - although much of the time I think he does like it and is just a bit disinclined (like many kids) to practise when it's a new and tricky piece. What I can't condone is this idea that he should drop one thing and try another.
AM I being unreasonable? To me that's just lazy parenting, but DP says I am being a dragon...