Another agreeing that she doesn't have to agree to sweeps, internals or induction if she doesn't want to and they can be very painful, sometimes I think that because HCPs do them so regularly they can forget what it's like to be on the receiving end of them.
I have gone between 11 & 14 days over with all my 4. Was induced with DS1 at 11 days over but they found he was breech during process and so had emergency c-section. Because of c-s, consultant wouldn't induce with the other 3 so went into labour naturally, but overdue with them all. Didn't have any extra monitoring, just weekly appt with consultant.
A lot of maternity practice is based on custom and procedure rather than being individually considered and what's interesting is that these differ from place to place, even between consultants at the same hospital (some like to induce at 7 days over, some like to induce at 11 days, other at 14 days) so when you look in more detail, they aren't really as evidence based as we might expect. Also the dating scans can be out by about a week either side so a baby being considered overdue might actually not be.
Personally, I'm a big fan of letting things happen naturally unless there is compelling evidence to suggest an intervention and that is what induction is, it isn't a friendly push in the right direction but a medical intervention which is why it has to be done in hospital etc. From other's accounts of induction, it can often take longer (because the body and the baby just aren't ready yet which is why labour hadn't started yet) and can be more painful because there isn't a gradual build-up of contractions but they start hard and fast. But as long as the woman has made an informed decision which includes the midwives being sympathetic to any concerns and explaining thing thoroughly, that's the important thing.
Sorry for the essay but experiences of childbirth is one of my areas of research so I can get carried away
.