Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To agree Samoan Airline charging by total weight? Although DETEST lazy/rude term 'fat tax' used, as it's NOT a 'tax' on 'fat' travellers; it's a you/me pay for all of our 'total travel weight' policy?

29 replies

StoicButStressed · 04/04/2013 11:57

Just saw this piece in Telegraph today, and found myself kinda nodding.

Much as I would LOVE this policy on all airlines (both financial & personal space/discomfort reasons below), I would though NOT be in favour of it unless it very specifically exempted people who had a medical condition confirmed by their Doctor that in ANY way contributed to their 'total travel weight' - whether that be permanant or temporary (IE all & everything genuinely medically driven from Thyroid issues to being disabled to simply being much heavier at that particular time due to say having just had no choice but to take steroids for a medical reason). As long as THAT exemption was in place, here's why I would welcome it:

1 - Biggest single variable cost of an individual flight is fuel. Every single kilo on board adds to that cost (hence my/you - pretty validly - having to pay extra for additional weight travel with). Why should my/your 'total travel weight' (IE me/DCs/luggage etc) be XY, but someone else's be XX, yet we have to pay the same? IE to put it bluntly, already be paying a frickin fortune (to point where maybe simply cannot now afford to fly) but part of that being to subsidise someone else's 'total travel weight' Hmm

[NB do though think it is outrageous for any airline to try to charge for wheelchairs etc as that DOES seem like a genuine 'tax' on disability per se, so ANY medical items like that should NOT - IMHO - fall into any 'total travel weight' calcs.]

2 - Know I might get flamed for this but these are simple facts & not intended to offend anyone (& I can't see why they would TBH as THEY ARE simply truths/real experiences?). I used to fly a lot work-wise plus family hols etc. Lost count of the number of times where I was - literally - wedged into my seat due to the sheer physicality of someone else's body, and to the point of real discomfort.

Not even talking about the overspill onto the seat divider/occupying armrest for whole flight etc, but literally where someone else was spilling over their seat into mine - IE one of their legs squashed up against my thigh (as in, total body contact thigh to thigh with a complete stranger??!); one of their feet in the place where I was meant to be able to put my two feet; squashing me from shoulder down to armrest level where part of their body was simply on BOTH their seat AND on part of mine?

Thoughts?

< Only 2nd foray onto AIBU so donning hard hatGrin >

OP posts:
Nicolaeus · 04/04/2013 13:48

There are 2 issues:

1 - the fuel needed to fly per kilo
2 - the space needed for all flyers to be comfortable

Charging per kilo seems a simple solution, after all a plane full of 9 stone passengers needs less fuel to fly than a plane full of 15 stone passengers, so why should the light passengers 'subsidise' the heavier passengers?

I kinda see the point - I weigh considerably less than my DB but still
Pay the same for a seat. However, I don't like the idea of paying extra if you weigh more. What, concretely, would these passengers get fthe extra money they paid?

I would agree with large (think obese) passengers having to buy 2 seats - at least then they get more for their money and will be more comfortable, and the passengers next to them will get to enjoy 100% of the seat they paid for.

Maat · 04/04/2013 13:50

I understand the whole weight / fuel / cost argument but it would probably cost a massive amount in administration to implement.

What happens when we all weigh more coming back from our holidays than going?

We also have a standard luggage allowance (I think usually 20kg) and people pay more if they go over it. But nobody gets a refund if they are under it. Why is that not used as a starting point before weighing passengers?

whatsleep · 04/04/2013 17:00

Why thank you Stoic, I shall place it with pride in my overflowing trophie cabinet Grin

kiwigirl42 · 04/04/2013 17:12

I'm 6 foot 2 and I will always weigh more than a shorter person even when my BMI is within a normal range. My normal healthy weight is 80 kg or there abouts.

So I am being discriminated against for the height I have no control over

New posts on this thread. Refresh page