Maternity Leave article - AIBU to think this is simply misleading & wrong?

[BeCool]

Link to page elsewhere on MN

It a summary/comparison of maternity benefits around the world.

But for the UK it says this:
"British Mums get 52 weeks off, with up to 90% of their pay. UK Mums can apply for other means tested benefits too."

I don't know anyone at all who got 90% of their pay for 52% weeks. You get 90% of your pay for SIX WEEKS only, then SMP for up to 34 weeks, then a further 3 months without any ££ at all. Your employer may give you further benefits but these would be a bonus, not the norm.

I thought it was going to be an interesting article - but the way the situation in the UK is misrepresented, gives me no faith at all that other countries are being accurately represented either - rendering the entire article rather pointless. I know they have used " up to 90%" but surely that's no excuse as the situation is at best, inaccurately or misleadingly summarised.

AIBU to wonder why the Debt Advisory Centre misrepresented the UK situation so badly? Or am I being overly pinicky? (bit cranky this morning)

You are wrong as well

Pay

Statutory Maternity Pay (SMP) is paid for up to 39 weeks.
You get:
90% of your average weekly earnings (before tax) for the first 6 weeks
£135.45 or 90% of your average weekly earnings (whichever is lower) for the next 33 weeks

SMP is paid in the same way as your wages (eg monthly or weekly). Tax and National Insurance will be deducted.

ah I was a week out - just adding the weeks up in my head.
Still I'm not a journalist writing and publishing an article about it!

It is pretty misleading tbh.

Agree with you completely: very misleading.

I agree with you.

My employer gives twenty weeks' full pay, then nineteen weeks of SMP. It is the most generous I have heard of in the UK.

ellies that is really fantastic!

very misleading

I had a frightening conversation with a heavily pregnant lady working at a fast food restaurant who was sure that she would be on full pay for a year.
She handn't asked her employer, had just assumed that evetyone got that from all employers .

Yes, we are very lucky. We also don't have to pay back any of it back if we choose not to return after maternity leave.

YANBU.

That is very misleading wording.

I got 6 months full, 3 smp, 3 nothing then after going back a lump sum making up the difference between my 3 smp months and full pay so basically full pay for 9m but am well aware this is above the norm!

If it makes you feel any worse better, the figures given for Sweden are almost correct. We get 480 days (including saturdays and sundays) parental leave, split equally between both parents. Although either parent can transfer all but 60 of their days to the other parent. Statutory Parental Leave is indeed 80% of salary (subject to a high earnings cap) for the entire duration and many employers have agreements with the unions to pay the additional 20%.

Parents who don't work get Statutory Parental Leave at approx £22 per day for any time they take.

FriedPotaoes that is a dreadful scenario. Still at least she will have the resources of the Debt Advisory Centre to help her if she needs it ..........

Oh! [buconfused] [bublush]

I got 9 months full pay, I think it increased to 1 year soon after I returned to work. But that was 9 years ago!

I haven't worked at my place long enough to qualify for SMP so will be entitled to Maternity Benefit (£135/ week) for 39 weeks. My employer, as I understand it is required to give me back my old job without substantial changes in duties/ expectations but this is only for 6 months? They are required to give me a job after 12 months but can have made changes to pay/ conditions on my return.

What's your line of work, Paradise and Ellie?

As a near or actual minimum-wage worker she'll probably be better off on full-time benefits than actually getting her full-time wage. Those who feel the pain are in the middle.

I got 9 months full pay, I think it increased to 1 year soon after I returned to work. But that was 9 years ago!

Hullo all,

Thanks for bringing this to our attention, we'll pass this onto our content team

Thanks KateS

Why is Germany not mentioned in the top 4?

With 3 years off for each child born I think they should be mentioned.

You either get 1 year on 60% pay and the rest unpaid, or 2 years on 30% and the rest unpaid. Never mind the very, very generous child benefit on top. 185 euros a months for each the first and second child, more after that.

Friedpotatoes - i had the same discussion with DH and all my friends when i got pregnant. No matter how i tried to explain it they all were convinced everyone got a year of full pay

When it sunk in to a few they were outraged. They had all thought the language of people saying 'you get a year off' meant a year at full pay. As it was all i got was MA as i hadn't worked at my company for long enough.

I think the way it is described needs to be much more explicit.

I didn't see Germany in the list?

But was told by a sister-in-law many decades ago, that they had 1 years mat pay and the right to return to the same position within 7 years time. All laid down by law.

digerd, it's 3 years for Germany. Has been for at least 20 years. Only how it's paid changes from time to time.

But 3 years for each child, so if you had a second, 2 years into your ML, you don't lose the third year of the first batch, it accumulates for each child.

Yy, 39 weeks. I got 14 weeks full pay, 25 on SMP and I could have had the rest of the year off unpaid, but couldn't afford it. SMP is a tricky subject - for me it means a huge drop in our joint income. However, I know I'm lucky to get anything. 1 year on 60% pay would be fantastic! And 80% even better.

I had no children < sadly>and didn't work while resident in Germany, but know their insurance benefits are very generous.

Although my DH did complain that his deductions from pay were near to 50%.
But that included an brilliant Health Care system.