well said dr coconut.
I would love to retrain but high tuition fees, dricriminatry rules on retraining and no help with childcare mean I cant.
If I go out tommorow under new system get myself p/t job seena few 8hour positions going national min wage then
its be under 10k so wouldent be paying any tax.
but it also means i wont be eligible for 1200 per child even though we both working.
perhaps if both me and husand were low paid ie he earnts 12-15k get we get working tax credits which I think help top up a low paid persons wages and some help with childcare.
yet 2low paid parents be paying not very much tax .
I used to be on 20k after child no 1 and it dident stretch far after childcare.
what Im angry about and surly its obvious is
if mum goes out to work and her husband earns higher salary than they cant get 1200 as they not earning enough!Because tax credits eligibility are measured on joint income!
yet new child benefit is taken individaully which gives the anomoly of 2high paid people still getting and one on 60k not getting.
its because its too expensive to menas test so they doing it in this unfair way.
what incentive is their for a sahm with middle income husband ie to go out get part time work if they very little gain, more stress and have to pay for childcare?
Tax credits just stop employers paying decent wages as they make up shortfall.if couple are getting more in tax credits that match /equal earnings and more than the tax they paying in then whats the net benefit?
Tax credits did stipulate 16hours which recently gone up to 24hours yet employers are not increasing hours.
Think the new unversil credit does not stipulate amount of hours just that they both work yet the new childcare stipulates 10 29hours at natoional min wage which is just short of fulltime and would need childcare.
Tax credits are not income they a benefit!
I know 1single part time mum.works less than tax threshold so pays no tax, pays little ni i guess.
get 600housing
80cb
120quid a week tax credits for 1child/
350 maintaiance from ex does not count as income.
council tax relief not sure how much.
free school dinners -ours is 40per month!
yes shes working but shes not making huge contribution and her childs a junnior and she has family close by.
The majority of working mums I know have 1 child school age.
If i just had 1 child school age I would have returned to work but I have 2toddlers and childcare for the just too pricey.
People also assume every schools has breckfast club/after school clubs and they dont so state educational provision and nursery education is not level playing feild in uk.
The only people I hear of having nannies and au pairs are very wealthy or high income.
A few working parents use private day schools as wrap around provison is better than state and have holiday clubs as the 2nearest preps do but we cant afford private school for 3 unless both earning high salaries.
Im bit shocked at the viciousness of working mums towards sahm mums.
I believe in freedom of choice and not judging others for choices they make.
we pay for our choices by having less money but we get by.
apart from c and little bit relief on tax funded vouchers get no state help.
We not even taking into consideration costs of living different areas.
housing into account those lucky enough to get social housing pay less rent than private.
the leader of a union bob crow 200k_ a year lives in a council house.
Yes privates expensive but for those getting hosuing benefit means they have a lot more of their earnings.
we rent private and cant afford to buy.Again our choice although whn went to bank for mortgage when we both worked combined salary of 52k at time they offered us 125k which buys very little here.
banks actually look at affordability so childcare costs are taken into consideration.
Every ones making assumptions about peoples choices think its black and white its not.