I am going to a concert this weekend. Out of the kindness of my heart, I invited new work colleague (A), who is new to the area, along. I am travelling there and back alone but will meet friends there and watch the concert together.
Work colleague wants to bring brand-new squeeze along. No probs, more the merrier. So, he'll be paying for her, her transport and drinks etc as she is a student.
We live very close to each other. Transport there and back will probably be around £15 pp (bus and tube there plus we will share taxi back). The cost of the concert ticket is £25.
Another colleague (B) can't afford to come, but would drive us for free if we paid for his ticket. He also lives close by, so could pick us up and drop us from our doors.
I proposed this to work colleague A, who refused to split it on the grounds that he's already paying for another person. He proposed that I pay the whole cost of the ticket, because he's already paying for somebody else and it wouldn't be 'fair'.
If I pay the whole £25 cost of the ticket, I'm then subsidising work colleage A + his squeeze's entire transport cost. And paying £10 more than I would using public.
If we split the ticket, I save £2.50- not really enough to be massively bothered with. However, he saves £17.50. I've pointed this out to him, but he still insists that it wouldn't be 'fair' to split the ticket and that I should pay.
AIBU to think:
- That my new colleague is unable to do simple mathematics
- That I am not paying the full cost of colleague B's ticket
- That it is perfectly fair to split the ticket cost
- That I am never inviting anyone along to anything out of pity ever again
I'm not being stingy, am I? Being made to feel like I am at the moment.