We were with a group of friends last night and we started to talk about video games.
It transpires that one of the teachers had commented that it wasn't appropriate for child A to play on these particular games as he has a life limiting condition and can be aggressive at times. This lead me to saying that call of duty was rated 18 for its extreme violence and there is a reason children ( of 9) should not be exposed to them. The father owns a shotgun and has instilled in the boys the danger of guns etc and is also in the forces so effectively has been trained to kill and I said that because of his occupation that he looks at these war games in a different light to me.
The mum then said that as child A has this illness that if he Enjoys these games and he is not able to run around with the others, then why not let him play them as it is something he can do. I totally get what she says and agree to a point but have reservations about playing these games.
We then got onto pornography and these being rated 18 - I questioned why you feel pornography is unacceptable yet these games aren't and they are both rated 18 for a reason.
Parent of child B then said he let son of same age play the games too and said it was 1% of children adversely affected by these games - but how do you know whether it will be your child in years to come? Change of conversation to something lighter......
Aibu