Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think if you inject faecal waste into a child's bloodstream

9 replies

astreetcarnamedknackered · 29/05/2012 20:10

you should go to prison.

My bet is the woman is the child's mother. In which case even more so should she go to prison.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2151198/Woman-39-injected-waste-matter-containing-E-coli-childs-intravenous-drip-lay-ill-hospital.html

OP posts:
LentillyFart · 29/05/2012 20:11

Clearly the woman is deeply unwell - but you're right - she should get the helps she needs away from people around her to whom she probably poses a danger still

astreetcarnamedknackered · 29/05/2012 20:17

I agree she should get help. But surely if not prison then custody in the form of a hospital order? Something to mark what she has done.

OP posts:
McHappyPants2012 · 29/05/2012 20:22

to me if they think someone is a harm to themselves or other around then the person should be sectioned under the mental heath act.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2151198/Woman-39-injected-waste-matter-containing-E-coli-childs-intravenous-drip-lay-ill-hospital.html clicky

HappyJustToBe · 29/05/2012 20:29

When I read headlines such as that I hope that the judge has made the right decision based on a lot more information than we have to hand, such as the pre-sentence report etc. It is hard to believe that such circumstances exist though unfortunately in this case.

I do not envy those sentencing in cases where the balance of rehabilitation, punishment and protection seem so at odds.

lovebunny · 29/05/2012 21:46

oh no. i can't help it. 'that's a shit thing to do'. sorry.

prison. unless the mental health 'sentence' is indefinite.

AnyoneforTurps · 29/05/2012 21:50

You can only section someone under the mental health act for treatment; it does not apply in a case like this.

Birdsgottafly · 29/05/2012 21:52

She has been placed under a Community Treatment Order, which, personally knowing the conditions of these and other similar cases, thisis the best course of action. A custodialsentence in this case wouldn't serve any purpose.

Ismeyes · 29/05/2012 22:02

Just to agree with Turps and Birdsgottafly, Mental Health Act would not be appropriate here, the CTO is the right thing to do and is obviously based on a lot more information than we have here.

Birdsgottafly · 29/05/2012 22:10

Just to add that she has been given a suspended sentence and on breaking the CTO, would be arrested and imprisoned.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page