Had this in chat but didn't get any response, so I'm braving AIBU (eek!)
Our boiler's always been a bit eccentric but at the end of the day has always provided central heating and hot water. I had it serviced yesterday and metioned to the plumber that it sometimes loses pressure and has to be topped up before it will work again. This was not the main reason for having the service, but was an issue I wanted to raise during the service. I told him that this used to happen quite a lot last year but has only happened about 3 times in the last six months. So, he explained what might be causing that and topped up the expansion vessel (I have learnt a lot of boiler jargon in the last 24 hrs!).
Since yesterday the system has lots pressure every time the heating has come on (thermostat is set quite low so it comes on maybe two or three times a day and stays on for about 20 mins a time). Wah! So I phoned the company this morning and a different plumber came round straight away and tells me that the expansion vessel has burst and it will need a new one, costing a further £140 on top of the cost of the service.
I appreciate that it would have gone at some point but it had been working ok. I think that the original plumber's intentions were entirely honourable but I can't help but feel that they've 'broken' my boiler and now it's going to cost me £££ to fix it. Second plumber said that there was always a risk of the thing bursting but first plumber did not mention this risk. If he had mentioned this risk (and how much it would cost to fix it) I honestly don't know whether I would have asked him to go ahead with topping it up.
So, I really don't know if they've done anything wrong or not. Do I suck it up and pay the full amount or do I have grounds to try and negotiate a lower bill? If so, how do I argue this? I've got nobody to talk to about this in RL today and I really can't decide either way.
Arse.
Apologies for long and tedious post. Thank you very much if you got this far!