OMG I got about a quarter of the way through and had to stop.
She is not unattractive but I don't know what your definition of "better figure than average" but I'm afraid hers leaves me a little cold but it could be her clothing in that article. None of the clothes flatter her at all (no curves and her legs look... average).
I am not above enjoying looking at females and my tastes are very broad. I generally find something attractive about everyone as (vomit buckets ready) beauty does show from the inside out. I, personally, wouldn't say height is a factor nor age (that said I wouldn't have guessed 41 looking at her I'd have gone for at least 10 years older. I'm probably lucky in that regard as my wife is 46 but looks mid 30s at the oldest. That is not a criticism just an observation after all I prefer Twiggy today by miles to Twiggy in the 60s. Part of that is that she is just prettier now but it is also because she actually has a body now).
I really don't want to go on here as I'm opening myself up for more scorn than she has given that this is MN but I have to say if "Victoria Beckham" is your benchmark then it is going to be very hard to have a sensible conversation about looks given that Posh is far too skinny, lacking in feminine qualities and a tad harsh looking for me.
My issue with the article (beyond that it is published on toilet paper The Hate Daily Mail) is her ego. I have no problem with people saying that they are attractive nor finding themselves to be beautiful. I love that and frankly it is wonderful when it happens but she does not do that. She is trying to rub every other woman in the worlds face in how wonderful her life is because of her looks... and I don't get it...
I'd normally look at a woman and as I say think "i like..." rather than "I dislike..." and even if she had just said "I'm pretty and I know it" I'd have probably done that but I can't having read her article. Her breasts are heading south in the wedding pic and show no pertness (nor shape) in any pic (no issue with real breasts at all but she seems to have picked terrible bras in every single photo), her skin quality is mediocre at best when flesh is showing, she is starting to show age in her neck at a very young age, she is not really all that pretty tbh, her legs have little shape to them and frankly I do not buy the premise of the article at all. I hate, absolutely hate having written all that as it is not how I'd normally view people but it is what the article does to me. My wife has 5 years on her, is much shorter and is, by her own admission, a touch too curvy but if I was to see her and this lady in the article in a bar for the first time I know which one I'd find attractive and which one I'd probably think was OK... average... It would be the other half who'd be getting drinks bought for her by me and not in any universe this lady.
I stand by to be run off the boards with flaming pitchforks as I feel terrible as a male talking critically about a lady in purely shallow terms but I honestly don't think I'm being completely shallow. I knew nothing of her, I read the OP, I googled and my initial thoughts were "ok... not unattractive... personally not to my taste at all" and then I read the article and found it hard to see what I thought was OK to begin with.
It makes me shudder to have written all that but the article makes me so angry. How dare she put down every other woman!? I have no problem at all with confidence and self belief but this is not that at all this is rampant ego trying to make others feel bad built upon an average foundation.