dns, why not apply for post docs? In case it helps, we have advertised three times in the last two years for post doc positions, and never had more than 10 applicants. This last time we didn't get anyone we even wanted to interview. Supreme confidence is not in the job description, and tbh I am fed up with newly qualified PhDs who think they know it all. Someone prepared to admit what they don't know, so I can help fill the gaps in their knowledge would be a refreshing change.
I want someone bright, and interested in what they do, with relevant skills, experience or knowledge. If I see two out of the last three I will definitely interview, one and they have a chance. I've never had an application from someone who has all three! Also, they must be able to write, so I expect a cover letter, one or two pages, telling me about themselves, about what they know about us (mentioning that one of my recent papers that they've read, for example) and why they think we'd fit. A career break wouldn't put me off if you can convince me you have an insightful mind and are ready to return to work.
In contrast, a colleague recently advertised a technician post, and got 130 applications. If I saw someone with a PhD applying for a tech post, I would wonder why, and with 130 applicants, it would be easy to find alternatives.
Outside of academic posts, our lab managers have PhDs, as do some of our admin staff. When we are looking for someone to administrate grant submissions, then someone who can cast a critical eye over the scientific case is really valuable.
If you are thinking of applying for post docs, I'd be happy to look at your (suitably anonymised) CV/sample cover letter by PM. Science needs more good women working in it!