'In the shape of a number 2' - am I the only one that read that a bit wrong the first time??
Thanks, can't get that thought out of my head now.
Also loving the suggestion I get DH to bake it. Think I'll just text him saying "Darling, this weekend, could you please whip up a cake in the shape of a number 2 and craft some farmyard animals out of icing to go on top? There's a dear..."
I suppose the reason I'm not making one is I don't have any baking equipment. Not a single cake tin
(I always think I'll have these things when I'm a proper grown-up). Even I bought all the gear, I'd still have to have a few attempts before I'd consider serving one up in public.
(I have never baked a cake)
Then, weirdly given my OP, I actually think shop-bought cakes are more reliably tasty than home-made ones *(despite the 46 bits of crap). I reckon good baking is quite a skill and it seems to me (based on the amount of cake I've hidden in hankies or disposed of in the nearest wheelie-bin after children's parties) that far too many people think they're good at it just because it seems easy. 2 inches of sugary, gooey frosting dumped on top of 12 inches of dry sponge isn't my idea of confectionary heaven.
See, last year we had a Waitrose one, didn't bother looking at the ingredients and it was flipping gorgeous. But now I can't stop thinking about humectant vegetable glycerine and sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate.