Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Pregnancy/Breastfeeding Pictures

47 replies

GrownUp2012 · 17/01/2012 16:50

What are your feelings?

I know there was a campaign on Facebook a while back regards the policy of banning breastfeeding pictures under the nudity rules, and now it appears that someone has had their account deleted for a bump picture along the same lines.

www.facebook.com/pages/Bumps-are-Beautiful-not-Porn/281814288539519

AIBU to think there is no big deal about these sorts of pictures? Or should they be private?

OP posts:
SardineQueen · 17/01/2012 18:24

They wouldn't remove any pictures that were complained about unless they breach their policy in some way. The BF ones which were removed, were removed on the basis that they breached their obscenity policy.

WorraLiberty · 17/01/2012 18:24

It wouldn't surprise me if this was a storm in a teacup and she's been banned/suspended by mistake.

It happened to a friend of mine...FB said her pictures were inappropriate until she pointed out they were photos of her garden Lol.

FB apolosiged and her account was back up a few hours later.

GrownUp2012 · 17/01/2012 18:25

It is what is being said on this group. Some seem to believe that an outright ban wouldn't happen for one offence and usually pictures are just deleted, so there is some debate on that, but I'm not in the middle of it, just raising something of interest I saw on my old Due In group on facebook.

OP posts:
WorraLiberty · 17/01/2012 18:25

'apolosiged'???? Errr they said sorry Blush

AnyFucker · 17/01/2012 19:10

storm in a D-cup ?

catgirl1976 · 17/01/2012 19:24

vair good! Grin

scarletforya · 17/01/2012 19:37

I hate facebook anyway. But I just don't get why anyone wants to show their bump or breastfeeding boobs anyway? Confused

It's not like anyone wants to see it anyway. It's TMI.

I'm pregnant and I won't be imposing my body on anyone else. It's called BOUNDARIES having a bit of MODESTY !!!

catgirl1976 · 17/01/2012 19:48

i put mine on as a lot of my friends and family who dont live near me were asking to see them. some people do want to see bump pics and some people do want to share them.

KittyFane · 17/01/2012 19:49

birds- loads of things I am not interested in seeing Kitty, but it doesn't mean I expect them to be banned. Banning them sends a message they are wrong or offensive in some way. God knows we've all seen photos of massive cleavage and such on FB, why are 'sexy' poses ok and pregnant bumps not?
List of things that I would rather wasn't shared with me and the world on FB
Bare bumps, breastfeeding babies, DC in bath, baby being born.
Sexy cleavage photos. DH in bath.
Nothing wrong with any of it but with such rubbish security (photos are easily saved/ shared, no real control over who sees/passes on stuff despite what they say).
I think they should ban it. Not because it's wrong but because they can't really guarantee privacy.

OmniaParatus · 17/01/2012 19:50

I wouldn't put pics of that on fb- but I find it quite annoying that I couldn't if I want to because someone else has inappropriately sexualised bf and bumps.

I DID let my sister take a photo of my bf ds2 for an antenatal class. She has difficulty demonstrating the latch without such pics as so few people have ever seen a baby being bf. And if the attitude that it is sexual and embarrassing to bf persists and is perpetuated by fb policy I can't see that changing any time soon.

catgirl1976 · 17/01/2012 19:51

why should they ban something just because you dont like it? you dont have to view photos or put yours up. but banning things you dont like is a bit much.

StewieGriffinsMom · 17/01/2012 20:23

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

GrownUp2012 · 18/01/2012 09:57

I think I have pictures on facebook of my bump, not specifically pictures taken of my bump, but a picture of me taken which shows it, if that makes sense. I also have a breastfeeding picture, because I was trying to get a shot of DD in the first few days on my phone so I could upload it for a friend to see and at the time she wouldn't get off the breast, so I did the whole lot (taking, uploading, showing in MSN chat) while she was breastfeeding, and I kept the picture because the dopey face they have while feeding is so cute. I have scan pictures, and weekly pictures, then monthly pictures to show the progress of her first year. Some are in the bath because she is a proper water baby and loved the water. It's lovely all of it, a proper progress from tiny foetus to three year old in an album shared with the seventy or so people I class as family or friends, and to think any of it is considered contravening the rules due to nudity or obscenity is actually sickening, considering how completely natural it all is and what it's being compared against. Anyone who doesn't want to see that sort of stuff doesn't need to click through my pictures.

OP posts:
porcamiseria · 18/01/2012 10:08

i DONT CARE, too much shit going down in the world this is MINOR

TheCountessOlenska · 18/01/2012 12:28

Naked bump - no
Clothed bump - yes
DC in bath - no (not fair on them)
Normal breastfeeding i.e pulled up top and baby's head covering breast - yes
Naked breastfeeding - no

IMO

hackmum · 18/01/2012 12:30

I wish people wouldn't say "pregnant stomachs". Your stomach isn't holding a baby! "Pregnant abdomens" is better. (Sorry, know I'm being pedantic.)

samandi · 18/01/2012 12:45

Naked bump - no

Presumably you would feel the same about non-pregnant people's abdomens? Or is it the bump specifically that you find so offensive? What about beer bellies?

UnimaginitiveDadThemedUsername · 18/01/2012 13:40

To me, photographs of people breastfeeding are like photographs of people on the toilet.

It's a perfectly natural activity but I don't want to see pictures of it. And I'd question the sanity of anyone (a) willing to be in such a picture, and (b) putting it in a public forum.

ClothesOfSand · 18/01/2012 13:47

I consider looking at the faces of miserable, angry, self righteous people as being equivalent to looking at somebody on the toilet. Both are perfectly natural but I don't particularly want to see either.

I doubt FB is going to ban pictures of their miserable faces though.

SardineQueen · 18/01/2012 14:35

This is about images of things like pregnant abdomens, women BF, children in the bath etc.

The facebook policy is about images that are obscene or pornographic. None of the things above are obscene or pornographic and to say they are is a really disturbing message to be put out there.

eg why should women have the right to BF in public if it has been accepted that this is an obscene / pornographic activity? Answer = they shouldn't. But of course women can do this, and it is right that women can do this, as BF a baby is neither obscene or pornographic

catgirl1976 · 19/01/2012 16:52

Totally agree with sq. There is something very wrong with anyone who finds a bump or a bf woman either pornographic or obscene or something that makes them uncomfortable

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread