AIBU to think billboards are advertising to drivers and need to be rethought.
Where I live there are oodles of billboards along the main roads all aimed at drivers. They are becoming increasingly sophisticated and now most are at least animated (like giant TV screens) and will often feature full size real cars or other 3D elements - no longer a poster on a board. They can be very clever, but I find it disturbing that these very eye-catching and distracting advertisements are targeting DRIVERS.
When I've questioned this before it has been explained away that the billboards are aimed at PASSENGERS not drivers - this is utter nonsense. On London's A4, which I an far too familiar with, I would estimate well above 90% of the cars carry one person only.
This article states advertisers pay up to £60k for one of 4 x 10 second slots for 2 weeks to advertise to cars going over the Hammersmith flyover (on relatively small screens compared to the others further down the road). Clearly, at this price, they are not targeting passengers only.
The local council takes 50% of the revenue - great! But it's a bit like the govt making so much money from tobacco sales - double edged sword.
I'm not saying these billboards cause accidents by the way - I have no idea if they do or not. There are plenty of unavoidable distractions for drivers - blatant advertising should not be one of them.
So AIBU to be really annoyed by billboards targeting drivers???? Or should I just lighten up & let it go (bugbear of mine for years)?