Two years ago my PILs apparently agreed to look after BIL's large mental untrained dog while BIL and SIL (they are in their thirties) go traveling for a year. They were to have it for half the time and her parents for the other half. Fast forward two years and we have a 18month old dd who MIL looks after two days a week (purely her choice and would do more if she could!) and is pushing for us to let her have dd for occasional overnights. We also spend a lot of time there as a family and all get on well.
Now I am by no means against dogs, I was brought up with large dogs and we have one ourselves, as do most of my family and the inlaws themselves. However this dog is a border collie, completely mad, and has never been trained, it jumps over furniture constantly running around the house, snatches food etc. It has also been known to nip when over excited The PILs have always struggled with it when looking after it and have been known to watch tv with it on a lead!
BIL has now reminded PIL of their earlier promise. Dh and I were worried about dd as We really don't want her to become frightened of dogs, we asked if SIL parents could look after it for the whole year and the PIL rang them to check, they said fine, no prob. Problem solved we thought but BIL and SIL are now not speaking to us and are barely talking to PIL because of it. They go away soon and I am left feeling like I have caused a family rift. was IBU and precious, what would you have done?