First, the murder of Stephen and the police's attitude were both terrible things and I strongly believe that both were as a result of racism. I am also not claiming that the verdict is wrong. I have not seen the evidence (only what the media has chosen to share).
The history of this case with its widespread publicity, the naming and shaming of the lads, and the video of the racism (despicable as it was it did not show a confession) all must have made it difficult for the jury.
But even if they had reasonable doubts, do you think the jury could have said not guilty?