4c4good wrote:
--
Alas this whole anti-Europe issue, as our canny leaders well know - speaks to unthinking jingoism, vague folk memories of WW2 and THAT opening graphic from Dad's Army - all fed and fanned into shameful nonsense by the right wing popular press who take advantage of the considerable ignorance of the issues, personalities, facts of the whole complex debate. I think this thread, with a few notable excceptions on either side of the euro-fence - is agood example
---
There are two examples here of slurs commonly used against anyone who questions the wonderfulness of the EU or dares to suggest that Britain would be better off out:
- The conflation of anti-EUism with anti-Europeanism or even with donwnight xenophobia.
The EU is a political project. Europe is a continent of widely varying cultures, languages and peoples. Criticism or rejection of the Project does not imply antipathy to the continent or the peoples.
I don't think that the UK should apply to join the USA but that doesn't make me anti-American.
Personally I would regard myself as a Europhile of the "Vive la difference" persuasion.
- The identification of anti-EU sentiment with being a loony right winger.
It's nothing to do with right or left wing. In fact the UK government which had the nature of the Project best sussed out was also arguably the most left wing; namely the post-war Attlee government. Some if the most articulate proponents of the case against the EU were people in this government or who were associated with it: Bevin, Gaitskell, Douglas Jay, Peter Shore, with the last surviving member of that generation being Tony Benn.
Back in the early post-war years they took one look at the emerging European Coal and Steel Community, realised exactly what it was all about, and would have nothing to do with it - quite rightly.