Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to ask how it costs the country nothing to have a day off for the Royal Wedding but half a billion for the strike today?but costs

16 replies

nicknamenotinuse · 30/11/2011 11:14

well...?

OP posts:
Kayano · 30/11/2011 11:15

YABU for having a huge post title that is so long I can't read it on my phone, and the main body of your thread is the word

'well'...

ChristinedePizanne · 30/11/2011 11:16

Ummm ... tourism and TV rights? Otherwise, very good point. Don't forget the Queen's birthday/golden jubilee next year - that's another day off to wave flags

chrimblycompo · 30/11/2011 11:17

because it was a bank holiday so most people were off work

today people have to find childcare or lose a days pay

nicknamenotinuse · 30/11/2011 11:18

sorry Kayano, my title really just says it all, didn't know what to put in the main body of the message. Sorry!

OP posts:
Kayano · 30/11/2011 11:18

Yes I got paid
On those days with them being bank holidays.

ZeldaUpNorth · 30/11/2011 11:20

We had more notice then too.

Iscreamtea · 30/11/2011 11:22

Who said the day off for the royal wedding cost nothing? Of course it had a cost.

Kayano · 30/11/2011 11:23

My BIL was told the school was
Not striking, then it was, then only certain classes were and then while school was
Closing.

NinkyNonker · 30/11/2011 11:24

In fact, given the staff striking aren't being paid there is a big difference.

NinkyNonker · 30/11/2011 11:25

Well, the news wasn't shouting about the cost of that, whereas they are shouting about the cost of this.

rycooler · 30/11/2011 11:25

People still got paid on RW day - ever single teacher on strike today will lose £100, that's £100 less they will spend, it's not difficult to work out is it.

nicknamenotinuse · 30/11/2011 11:26

exactly NickyNonker, that's all I've heard today about the massive cost yet there was nothing about the cost to the economy for the Royal Wedding.

OP posts:
nickelbabe · 30/11/2011 11:27

it was only a bank holiday because of the wedding, though, so that argument doesn't hold.
in fact, it means that it should cost more.

but, I think it's to do with the Tourism Pounds.

LunaticFringe · 30/11/2011 11:30

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

niceguy2 · 30/11/2011 11:33

Nobody said it cost nothing. There's a cost, of course there's a cost. But there also were huge benefits of the RW

To name a few, we drew in millions of pounds in tourism thanks to the floods of tourists who came to visit London. You couldn't get a hotel room for love nor money that weekend.

Millions were spent on security which benefited UK employees and police.

Billions was spent by people such as myself who took advantage of the day off to do some shopping followed by a few drinks and a meal at the pub.

It generates positive news across the world and puts UK in a good light, hopefully enticing more tourists to come to the UK and spend their money here.

The strikes on the other hand do no such thing. If anything it will put people off coming, many have been forced to take a day off as vacation if they are lucky, unpaid if not. Or pay out extra to childminders.

All to demand something which is unaffordable in the first place.

DesperatelySeekingPomBears · 30/11/2011 11:33

I thought the royal wedding bank holiday was optional? Plenty of private firms remained open on the day and continued trading whereas today people have been forced to take a day off work to provide childcare/because they couldn't get into work without public transport etc. That and the fact that American tourists won't be coming over here to witness a futile strike that won't make any difference to anything.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page