Name changed. Poo pouffe, penguins, towel elephants.
A family member of mine has just had a new baby DS. He is absolutely gorgeous and very sweet. :)
The grandfather of the baby remarried several years ago, and I know some things the wife did that would mean the new parents would likely want to keep the baby away from her. I suspect that contact between the woman and the baby may be sporadic anyway, due to distances, but the father of the baby (the grandfather's son, keep up!) would very likely not want contact between his son and his father's wife if the truth was known. It involves mistreatment of a younger sibling (once that sibling was the only child still living in the family home), quite serious comments made about all the siblings (there are four of them) and threats that were continued to be made towards the younger sibling into adulthood. The grandfather either did nothing, or also made comments.
The majority of this has been kept from the baby's father because he didn't get on well with his younger sibling and it has been unnecessary to bring up what was in the past for everyone. All he really knows for sure is that his younger sibling does not like their father's wife, though he may very well be vaguely aware that there is a lot more to it. Quite crucially, I believe that his wife knows nothing.
It is obviously not the choice of anyone other than the parents, who their baby sees or doesn't see as he grows up, but should the parents have the full information about someone who may have continued contact with their child? Bare in mind that this person may pose no threat to the baby at all, but also could, primarily if left in sole charge for periods, which is possible with babysitting. If it matters, it would be the younger sibling that would approach the parents of the baby with this information, with the full support of a number of family members.
Any advice welcome. Thanks.