My Dh is a solicitor, yesterday he pointed out this article to me from the Law Society Gazette.
www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/boris-johnson-criticises-legal-aid-proposals-domestic-violence
For a start, I am pretty shocked that I agree with Boris Johnson about anything, but he seems to have got a good point here. When the government proposed that legal aid for divorce and private children's matters would be withdrawn, they were adamant that victims of domestic abuse would be eligible for help. Under these proposals, victims would have to prove domestic violence 'through a formal judicial, police or social services process in which domestic violence was certified to have happened.'
Because of its very nature, domestic violence tends to be hidden and not reported. Those (usually) women who have been too frightened to report their abusive partners will not have sufficient proof to show that they have been victims and so will not be able to access legal aid. So, even if they have no funds available to them, they would have to stand up to their abuser in court in divorce or any contact disputes.
Of course it can't be right if the system allows a person to claim domestic violence without any challenge at all. After all, that would be too easy a way to get legal aid. What Boris is suggesting is that referral to other agencies should be taken as proof of domestic violence.
AIBU to agree with Boris?