oooooh Peachy, you've touched on one of my ranty-topics
Foreign aid. I have a lot of family in Kenya, including one who works in the president's press office. In fact, she visited us the other week. People are getting very pissed off with the whole west charity thing and the way they are being portrayed in the media here! And the fact that there are all these charities here, claiming they are doing this that and the other - when I talk to family and friends - I have yet to come across one who's seen any of these charities doing a damn thing! And of course, there's the difference between the mudhut living, barefoot, walking down a dusty road image that the charities would have you believe is the entire picture, and the skyscrapers in the cities, the people driving around in their 4wheel drives, with their mobile phones... the I.T. city that is being built konza or the rise of technology in africa bet not many people here know anything about that! The reality doesn't fit in with the image the west prefers of savage africa with everyone covered in flies.
If you gave me the amount of money that has been donated to oxfam etc over the years and sent me to east africa, every village would have a borehole and would be irrigating crops and would be farming happily by now. Do you know you can get a borehole up and running for £10,000? How many £10,000s do you think have been raised supposedly for africa? A hell of a lot. It's a great big con and it pisses me right off that people are being used by these companies to get people here to give their money.
But also charities here - the RSPCA for example. 119 million sitting in the bank and they've closed their doors to stray dogs I read recently. My parents tried to get help many times for stray cats living under their deck. Did the RSPCA do anything? Did they hell. How much have they actually done with the money they've had? How much should or could they have done with that money?
The NSPCC? Spends more money on advertising itself than on actually helping anyone, as far as I can see. I can't name a single thing they have actually done. Nothing springs to mind. Oh,there's childline - which they didn't set up but which they have now taken over, I think. But how have they actually, practically, really made a difference? In terms of the amount of money spent, I mean.
Too much of what they get is spent on keeping these businesses - for that is what they are - going. They chuck a token bit at the area they have identified, so they can claim that's what they do. But they don't change much. Because it's not in their interests to solve the problem. No more problem - no more charity. No more charity - no more great whacking salaries.
I don't know anything about cancer charities, so I can't comment. I would like to think that they are in fact working flat out to find cures.
Bet you wish you'd never talked to me now, don't you, Peachy 