Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

TO POINT OUT as well as being serious the injunction thing is rather funny. I knew it was Ronnie Biggs.

3 replies

ScousyFogarty · 24/05/2011 11:13

A woman in the library told me "I have 5 gigga bytes" I said "show me your neck?" True enough there were 5 indentations.

She fell to her knees and pleaded "Scousy, please dont ring the tabloids."

I said ...no I wont, but I will put it on Mumsnet. She said "bless you, I love Mumsnet"

serious side? Its crucified the Giggs family; but only they will know what Private arrangements they have over Ryans behaviour.

Press...I thought the Mirror had the best headline for a change, "Naming Private Ryan"

OP posts:
izzywhizzyletsgetbusy · 24/05/2011 11:18

Can't wait for this week's Private Eye to hit the newstands.

Crucified the Giggs family, Scousy? I think it's more a case of Lying Piggs having been hoisted by his own petard, and I reckon that headline should have been 'Shaming Private Ryan'.

Yama · 24/05/2011 11:20

Ooh, 'Shaming Private Ryan' much better Izzy.

ScousyFogarty · 24/05/2011 11:27

Izzy and Yama

yes, Izzy, Private Eye will have a field day. They did sort of breach the injunction at the bottom of the "spoon" thing.

Giggs is no stranger to tabloid sex stories. Before he was married he featured several times.

So did a lot of other top players. Rooney of course. We do have to be a bit careful. But when Wayne was young, he went to a massage parlour. No disguise, and started signing autographs in the waiting room. It was not a sensible thing to do.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page