knittedbreast, trapped, you've hit it in one
and whilst i know that poverty is relative (someone on NMW is quids in compared to a single 18 year old person who's just been let go but has no parental support e.g. my own cousin, who's so broke she's now having to move back to her parents in Glasgow despite having been in a secure flatshare in England for a year, working fulltime -she simply can't afford it)... it doesn't get around the fact that what 26minutes is still true:
in our parents generation, they were able to save a little, not spend extravagantly, and eventually pay off their own homes, support 1 person being off work for even a few years off work, on even modest incomes.
my best friend's dad was a postie - her mum has never worked - i don't remember her living in poverty - is that still true these days? i suspect not.
the rich are getting richer, and the poor are getting poorer. when was the last time in history there was such a thing as working poor if you had a fulltime job? i'm not sure if the term has been around much this CENTURY apart from in the last 10, 20 years. the gap between rich and poor is growing at a frightening pace.
people born in the 1940s, 50s, and 60s have truly had it all. in some cases, they have squandered it, but as a group they were very well looked after and had many of the opportunities and care that our generation - and even worse, the future generation - will only be able to DREAM about.