DH's father and step mother own a caravan, and we often rent the van from them. We have always paid towards the rental.
A long time ago, we found out that some of the other children did not pay for rental, mostly DH's step sister, and brother, but we were told that it was because they had children and we did not.
When we had DD, just before she turned one, we went down to the van and we were charged.
This year, we have asked for the van in the summer hols as DD is at school and we dont want to take her out for holidays. I am pg and due in a few weeks, the van is a convenient location as it isn't too far from home, so we can come home early if we need to.
FIL & MIL have recently got a newer van. FIL & MIL said that because it was a new van, and because we were going in the holidays, they would have to charge us. Which we said was fine.
Last week, DH was chatting with his brother (who can be a bit of an arse...) who mentioned they were going down to the van a week before us (still in the six weeks holidays). BIL was laughing at us, saying we were foolish for paying for the van, and he hadn't paid for the van for years.
I have never had objections paying for the van, I understand that they need to cover ground rent, and its cheaper than what we would be charged if we were renting somewhere else. But I feel a bit... narky... that DH get charged for the use of the van when nobody else appears to.
I don't want this to cause a family argument, but wwyd?