I've been ruminating on this and would like to make two points:
Point 1
I'm creative every day of my teaching career, trying to inspire 12 year olds to enjoy Chaucer, getting i5 year olds interested in Shakespeare or 16 year olds in structuring the right essay for their exams - and I defend the right to exercise that creativity bone in the job for which I am paid, rather than the extra-curricular fundraising that our school gets involved in.
Point 2
We raised £1000 for the teenage cancer trust with a non-uniform day last year.
We raised £600 for our local hospice the term before with a sponsored walk around the field.
One of my Y11 sold cakes to us the other week so she could raise money for her Guide trip abroad.
Each campaign raised awareness of each issue, actually depended on a fair amount of effort in some cases and each was very simple to organise, to include the maximum number of students and collect the money.
None of those charities/causes accepted the money with a
and a 'could do better'.
Anyway, the point raised by the op is so clearly laughable and the defence has been so weakly and uncharitable argued for the sake of not wanting to lose face, that it doesn't really matter. Not one other poster has agreed.
radiohelen:
As far as having a legitimate AIBU question answered, you have. With bells on.
If your question was rhetorical and, as rhetoric is used commonly to add emphasis, this also has been done. It emphasises that you are stubborn, arrogant and unreasonable.
In AIBU stakes, the motion is carried.