This is half AIBU and half rant
, have just reached the end of my tether. Been through a few months of school referring dd to TWO paediatricians as well as badgering me with increasing regularity, and now have just had my dsis (who has a sum total of no kids) giving me an hour long session of 'advice' too. Why? Because dd (7) is little and skinny, can't stand p.e. and is a little (tiny bit) immature for her age, that's IT!
Just in case it seems like I'm doing the rose-tinted PFB, dd has been seen by the gp several times who agrees she's skinny but says she's within normal limits and he has no concerns, and thinks the dislike of pe and love of being babied by the other children is perfectly normal. She doesn't have any behavioural difficulties at school, reads/writes/does maths etc above her age, just has cottoned on that if some older kids will fuss over her because she's little then that's a nice thing. Due to the referrals going awol we've only seen one paed who made a lot of cats bum faces but couldn't actually tell me what concerns she had, yet referred us to another paed anyway who we have yet to see.
As far as I can see it all stems from not liking to do pe (dd has said repeatedly it's boring and she can't see the point) and being naturally skinny (I was until damnable puberty latched me onto chocolate), in a class of mainly 'robust' sport freaks (that type of primary). Am I being unreasonable to not see what the fuss is about? And without resorting to asking WTF, how do I get it across to teachers/etc that I really don't get why dd not being an athlete is A Bad Thing?