cos I can't decide if I am or not!
a new-ish soft play place near here has a "toddler morning" on a couple of days a week. This special offer includes a free lunch box worth £3.95
My 2 youngest children are both dairy and egg intolerant, so we are used to not being able to get stuff to eat in places, but I figured I'd have a look anyway.
They made me up 2 jam sandwiches with no butter, that was fine.
But the only other things they could have (it was a pick-n-mix type thing) was fruit and vegetables.
they had 2 flavours of crisps, tomato or cheese, but both flavours had milk powder in. They also sell ready salted crisps seperately, but would not let me have those in the lunchbox instead.
they had 3 different kinds of milk chocolate biscuit.
They also sell those little packets of normal biscuits with 3 in a pack and I asked if I could have one of those instead of a chocolate biscuit or even if I could have one and split it between both the lunchboxes.
they said no, if i wanted them i'd have to buy them.
Now, this just seems really mean to me! one packet of cheap biscuits costs less to them than 2 penguins surely?
I do realise though that the lunchbox was free, and so in some way I feel like I can't complain about them having nothing suitable. I could have bought the children something else, but then I thought well why should I? it isn't my fault they have intolerances and yet I have to pay for a meal while everyone else gets one free
I am known for getting quite stressed by stuff like this though, so I can't decide whether or not to write to them and say that I think their provision for children with allergies/intolerances is poor or not?