Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think whether or not someone is told they're being unreasonable depends a lot on their phrasing?

13 replies

HeathcliffMoorland · 27/02/2011 15:18

Just an observation.

Since I first joined I've got better at avoiding flamings while expressing the same opinion just by changing my language a bit and avoiding certain words. Even if asking if a recent action was unreasonable.

I have also noticed different people posting similar threads and one person getting an easier time than the other, seemingly because of language.

Has anyone else noticed similar, or am I imagining things?

OP posts:
worraliberty · 27/02/2011 15:22

No I think you're right and sometimes it's not what's being said but which poster is saying it that's the dealbreaker.

HeathcliffMoorland · 27/02/2011 15:25

Agreed, worraliberty.

OP posts:
ladyfirenze · 27/02/2011 15:25

ooh really worra?

BuzzLiteBeer · 27/02/2011 15:26

language shapes thought and shows intent, so I think its perfectly normal to treat people differently depending on the language they use. How could you not?

GMajor7 · 27/02/2011 15:27

worral is quite right

worraliberty · 27/02/2011 15:28

I agree with that Buzz but some people have more of a problem typing than talking. Also, when you're reading a screen, you can't see mannerisms or expressions so for some people it is difficult to get their point across without being jumped on a bit quickly.

HeathcliffMoorland · 27/02/2011 15:35

I find it much harder to phrase things when typing. I can make tiny incidents sound huge and vice versa.

In real life, I can say something makes me seethe and mean it with humour. If I type it, I just sound angry. And I try to avoid overuse of emoticons, so that probably doesn't help.

OP posts:
ladyfirenze · 27/02/2011 15:38

Smile Grin Wink Shock

a picture says a thousand words heathcliff

squeakytoy · 27/02/2011 15:43

I completely agree. The smileys are there and should be used to emphasise your point..

For example.

My MIL can be such a bitch Grin

would imply that MIL is funny and has amused the op

My MIL can be such a bitch Angry

implies that MIL has really pissed off the op

HeathcliffMoorland · 27/02/2011 15:45

I do use them.

Just not loads.

I understand when I definitely need to.

I'm just a little bit sparing.

See: Grin

OP posts:
ladyfirenze · 27/02/2011 15:48

if it's any comfort, I can barely string a sentence together in RL Blush

mayorquimby · 27/02/2011 15:48

Well yes people know that if they use sympathetic language etc. they're more likely to get treated well.
So someone will describe a situation where they've been unreasonable to their husband for example but they'll put in caveats "It all got too much for me and we ended up arguing/I've been stressed recently/ hormones" or whatever so they'll encourage sympathy compared to if they just posted what they did.

HeathcliffMoorland · 27/02/2011 17:51

I think I'd probably be less sympathetic to someone blaming hormones than someone just telling the story. Not sure.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page