Sorry: posted about same subject in lone parents last night, but I phoned again to double check and am now confused by this reasoning.
My home contents insurance premium has gone up for two reasons:
- birth of second child
Well I understand that the destructive force of two little buggers could be greater than that of one.
- death of my OH.
Apparently, due to me now being a single parent 'the house is more likely to be left unoccupied at any one time.'
I asked whether they took into account regular time away from the house e.g. working hours. They do not. This seems bizarre given their reason for upping the premium.
So, for example, a couple who worked full time and left the house empty from 9-5 every week day would pay less than a single stay-at-home parent who was in the house all the farking time more of the time.
I pointed this out, but apparently they 'can't assess individual situations'.
Err, isn't assessing individual situations how they come up with a premium in the first place?
How difficult would it be to include the number of hours house is empty in their calculations - say tick boxes 'less than 10' '10-20' '20-50' etc?
Before I get flamed, please understand that I am really not getting at people who work long hours, it just seems an odd way of assessing things to me.
God, just read this back - I bore even myself sometimes. I think I need a glass of wine.