I often read about sexualsation of young girls if they wear certain clothing, taking away their childhood their innocence. I have never understood this, I let my daughter wear what she likes.
She often goes out in her PJs so we are lower class. The other day I picked her up from dance class and went to a Burger king for a meal, she wore a crop top, heels and trousers and I over heard whispers of look how that girl is dressed, her heeled shoes, that top is a disgrace. Yesterday after school we we stopped off at Tescos rip off Express, DD had kicked off her shoes so did not bother putting them back on when going into the shop, I heard the someone's astonished voice saying that girl has no shoes on! Yet is going without shoes not supposed to be healthy? been reading a lot about barefoot running recently and it seems the in thing (Been trying barefoot running out recently).
My friends DD school uniforms says a skirt needs to be no more then 5cms above her knee. So why is 2 inches acceptable and not 4 for example. Then there are trousers and leggings, which are acceptable, are they not? Yet leggings are quite tight and even trousers that are not figure hugging are quite tight around the hip region showing it off . So why are trousers and especially leggings not sex clothing.
Not posting this to be controversial just find the attitudes not consistent. I wore what I wished as a child and looking back I do not see any harm done.