DD goes for lessons precisely because I am a crap, unconfident swimmer who freaks out if she goes out of her depth, having self-taught (with a friend's help) at the age of 26
. I don't want her to have my issues around water and I want her to be able to have fun. DH is a strong swimmer and I hate that he can do that whole 'diving off the boat into the med' on holiday while I'm stuck dithering on the ladder...
I also want her to swim because if she did fall in, I couldn't do a damn thing to save her due to my crapness!
Both my parents could swim, and swim well, but despite living 5 mins from the sea it apparently never occurred to them to even take us to the baths, let alone teach us to swim themselves (there was no money for lessons).
I could be charitable and guess that as my mum has major weight issues she didn't want to be seen in a swimming costume, also my eldest brother has mild CP affecting his co-ordination and because they didn't take him (there seems to have been a general assumption in the 1960's/70's or perhaps just by my parents that doing any physical activity with children with CP was a waste of time as they couldn't do it 'properly' :(), they then carried on not taking any of us...
I learnt to swim at 26 because my younger brother was murdered when he was 19 - had his stuff robbed and was then thrown/pushed into a dock while the attacker made his getaway - we'll never know whether the ability to swim could have saved him or not, but the fact that he couldn't swim sure as hell made it a given that he didn't get out of there alive...
No child of mine is going to be without that skill. And it's fun, and it's exercise. Why so against it?