Toody, charging if a parent cancels, or goes on holiday, is perfectly reasonable as you are holding that child's place open. I also don't mind paying in advance, I certainly wouldn't want to work for a month without being 100 per cent sure I was going to be paid for it. If I was still using the CM, the days she was unavailable to work could be compensated for in the next month's money, but as the contract is now effectively terminated (DD's last day with her was the one, of at least five in the duration of the contract, she cancelled at short notice), it's a bit more awkward. She will have to refund the money, and I have the feeling she's not going to offer to do that and that I am going to have to push, not a pleasant situation. Do you mind me asking if it's the norm charge for bank holidays? (I'm not asking you to say whether you do or not, just trying to find out if it's accepted practice). I have been told, but not by the CM, that she is entitled to do so by her governing body, but my source is by no means reliable. If this is the case, then fair enough, it's their rules, not hers, but I find it a bit galling to pay someone for not providing a service. She isn't available for work on bank holidays, isn't holding a place open for my child, she's simply charging me for her free time. When I was self-employed, I was paid for the work I did. If I didn't provide the work, I didn't get paid. As a self-employed person, I didn't get sick pay or holiday pay.
Hmm, I'm feeling a bit of steely resolve settling in here. It's not a huge amount of money at stake here, certainly not enough to take it to a small claims court, but it's a significant enough amount to me. Thank you everyone for your posts,