Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

In laws sulking over 3 week old baby

35 replies

Renlovesyou · 25/12/2010 16:49

Basically our LO is 3 weeks old today. He was low birth weight so Ive been BFing on demand. He has no routine yet and sometimes feeds for hours and with only an hour inbetween. Its only understandable, hes tiny and trying to beef up!

In laws were told when he was born that we didnt plan on going out xmas day, as feeding might be an issue - I cant take him round to see them only to end up sat with him feeding for hours in MILs bedroom. It wouldnt be fun for them, him or me and they'd still barely see him. He screams continuously and they usually just try and make him pose for photos...

They are more than welcome here, and we made that clear. I can feed in my own front room/bedroom then and baby might be more relaxed. SIL with 1 year old lives next door too, so its two birds, one stone for them.

Despite saying this over and over since he was born, today we've had tearful phonecalls, emotional blackmail and other tactics to try and make us go over there.

DPs younger sister and brother just came over to see us for a while which was totally fine. But if DPs mum is really so devastated not to see us on xmas day, why cant she come here? She could have come with SIL and BIL?

Aside from that, shes had 35 years of people going to her house, why cant she allow one year off because we have had a baby?

And to make such a fuss that she couldnt see us on the day after saying nothing for 3 weeks, and then to pass up a chance to see us, feels like its just a power play.

They are muslim btw, so xmas is not a major celebration for them.

AIBU to be totally totally annoyed and think that we'll have this for years to come. When my baby is 5 will they still expect us to tear him away from his presents just because they dont want to go out on xmas day?!

OP posts:
onmyfeet · 26/12/2010 04:31

Yanbu. Sounds like she is not used to change in her routine and tradition. But when your children grow up and become parents, it is time to realize there will be new traditions.

Ignore the guilt trip, she is acting like a spoiled child. You invited them there, they were welcome.

I personally can't wait for my son's to get married and they can host these events, and I can be the guest. I am looking forward to it, and so is ds's girlfriend thankfully!

SantasSackura · 26/12/2010 05:14

She won't come to yours because she's a control freak. If she really wanted to see the baby she'd make the effort to come to you. She wants it to be All. ABout. Her, and unfortunately for her, a mother with a newborn has to prirotitize herself
To me, it's not even about the baby, it's about respecting a post-partum mother, a bit of respect for what she has just gone through, and an acknowledgement that this is the only time in her life a woman is allowed to put herself and her needs first.
Where I live , in Japan, it's unheard of to expect a post-partum mother and baby to leave the house for at least a month (unless they want to)

forehead · 26/12/2010 12:58

agree with SantasSackura about your mil being a control freak.

Renlovesyou · 26/12/2010 18:55

We've had a further issue today about SIL putting pictures of DS up on FB without asking us... DP hss asked her to remove them.

I felt very sad for MIL at first and then for my son - almost as if I was depriving them both. But seeing as she wouldnt come over, I started to think that it wasnt about seeing the baby on xmas day at all, it was about manipulation!

Another point is that my family totally understood we would not go out, but that they could pop over whenever they felt like it, and we had all the snacky foods in ready etc. This was also so that we could still see people, not have to go out and not be accused of visiting one family over the other. By going to MIL's house Id have totally gone back on that sentiment!

OP posts:
Megglevache · 28/12/2010 15:44

Why did you have a problem with the photos? IMO they're just showing off the baby aren't they???

TheSecondComing · 28/12/2010 15:49

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

iamusuallybeingunreasonable · 28/12/2010 15:59

You just don't put pictures of other peoples children on social networking sites, a, not your child to show off and b, you have no idea whose friend of a friend is sharing them with god knows who!

Yanbu

TheSecondComing · 28/12/2010 16:15

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Megglevache · 28/12/2010 16:20

thesecondcoming I am with you there.

I think that provided there are decent privacies set up I wouldn't have a problem with it and neither do any of my friends.

I think the OP has bigger fish to fry to be honest with you an dgettin gupset with her SIL putting up a few pics on her FB profile is th eleast of her worries. I 'm sure she posted them because she is excited about a new member of the family- unless the issues run deeper than what the OP has tol dus.

I feel happier being able to have photos which I edit/sort and post for friends to see than remembering a few years back in the dark ages when anyone could've been handling images of my children at snappysnaps and distributing them as they wish.

Megglevache · 28/12/2010 16:21

sorry about the typos! new keyboard that I am gettign used to!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page